CFER: What We're About
Connecticut Success Story
CFR: State by State
WHY? Public Financing
The Activists' Perspective
Links
Guestbook


WHY? Public Financing






      http://www.tastywebdesign.co.uk/why_so_tasty/images/why_so_tasty_09.jpg

       Why?




With the economy in meltdown, the Iraq and

Afghanistan
war ongoing, a broken health care

system and below par education system, and

numerous citizens losing jobs and housing –


Why
spend time talking about

Campaign Finance Reform and Public Financing?

 




 

Following are some of the benefits of Public Financing.

(At a cost of about $5.00 per voter per year)
                                                                             

     ·        Meet the acute need in politics 
    today for MONEY!


·       
End fundraising beg-a-thons


·       
Free candidates from the endless 
    money chase


·       
End indebtedness to lobbyists


·       
Reduce influence purchased


·       
Rekindle lost idealism in politics


·       
Let anyone run for public office     
    who wants to

    
·       
Level the lopsided fund-raising 
    playing field


·       
Increase the influence of under-
    represented voters


·       
Provide representatives time to 
    concentrate on the job


·       
Increase democratic representation 
    in small political parties


·       
Fight voter election fraud


·       
Energize the disenfranchised, 
    disenchanted voters


·       
Inspire student interest and 
    participation

 

WHAT      
do the participants themselves say about

Clean Elections?

As for campaign time-management benefits

Republican Senator Peter Mills of Maine said it was

refreshing not to have to spend so much time

raising money, or spending his own.

Rep. James Spallone, a Connecticut
Democrat

seeking re-election, said his state’s new program

allows him to engage his constituents directly

without being preoccupied with raising dollars.

Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano of Arizona likes

spending more time talking with voters instead of

“being on the phone selling $250 fundraiser

tickets.”

Maine Rep. Deborah Simpson
, with no prior

fundraising experience, said it seemed less daunting

to run knowing that she could depend on money

provided by her state’s election fund.

A female colleague of Simpson’s, a working single mom,

believes “public financing is great for those otherwise

too busy for fundraising.”


On freedom from interest groups

Democratic State Rep. Tom Cristiano of Connecticut

said “I appreciate that now big-money contributors

have less control over my destiny.”

And Arthur House, candidate for Senate in Connecticut,

states that the Citizens Election Program there changed

his focus from courting lobbyist contributions to making

his approaches directly to voting citizens.

Arizona Rep. Robert Meza said: “I don’t owe anyone any

favors after a race.”  His colleague,

Rep. Leah Landrum Taylor
, finds that voters are excited

about public financing because they feel their lawmaker

isn’t tied to special-interest dollars.

A candidate for Connecticut state representative,

Marc Ga
rafalo, went door to door asking for donations

of no more than ten dollars. He feels he wouldn’t have

run for office otherwise because it’s so difficult to beat

incumbents under the old system funded by lobbyists.


Re: benefits of getting more people into the process,


Cicero Booker of the Working Families Party, running for

Connecticut Senate, feels the poor and people of color

should have more of a voice. He said even disadvantaged

voters can now get involved and know their five-dollar

donation can be significant.

A successful Republican candidate for State Senate in

Connecticut
, Vincent Marino, said he decided to primary

against a popular incumbent after learning that

public funding would allow him to qualify by getting

small donations from as few as 300 people.

He used the qualifying process as a way to build a

grassroots network of supporters.


It’s a positive campaign issue


that works for most participants, including Maine

Senator Ed Youngblood,
who said he was rewarded

with election by identifying himself as a publicly

funded candidate. “I wanted to be able to say

I’m not accountable to anyone but the voter.”


Clean Elections works the same

for municipal candidates, too.

The executive director of the City Ethics Commission

in Los Angeles, Lee Pelham, observed that grassroots

candidates who run clean “feel they have a shot

at actually being a legitimate candidate” for city office.


     California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said it best:


  
"Special interests have a stranglehold on 

   the capital. Here's how it works. 

   Money comes in. Favors go out.The people lose."